Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | francesco fiorenzoni | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess
Sludge Monster ranks #4209 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 82%).
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sludge Monster is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 7.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 48.1%. Sludge Monster has a win rate of 70.4%, making it 46.4% better than other 5-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arcane Signet | Artifact | 6 | 53.3% | 1 |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 6 | 47.0% | 1 |
Toxrill, the Corrosive | Legendary Creature — Slug Horror | 6 | 47.0% | 1 |
The Meathook Massacre | Legendary Enchantment | 5 | 46.4% | 1 |
Infernal Grasp | Instant | 5 | 36.4% | 0 |
Morbid Opportunist | Creature — Human Rogue | 5 | 36.4% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Sludge Monster than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Meathook Massacre | Legendary Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 61.2% | +13.8% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 63.6% | +11.4% |
Toxrill, the Corrosive | Legendary Creature — Slug Horror | 7 | 5 | 75.0% | 64.7% | +10.3% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 5 | 0.2% | 45.0% |
Dimir Control | 1 | 1.1% | 57.1% |
Esper Pixie | 1 | 0.1% | 37.5% |
Izzet Prowess | 1 | 0.1% | 57.1% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.